After looking at user's Muse websites while fielding questions in this forum it's become apparent that there is no care taken in image optimization. Typically, if a Muse user chooses a full width background image it is around 3,000 x 2,000 pixels in resolution and at least 2mb (sometimes even more-- 3.5mb) in size.
With the low learning curve and lack of image optimization techniques by Muse users I think it would be wise to setup separate servers for Muse websites or at least ensure that Muse sites aren't hosted on the same servers that our Partner sites and Partner clients' sites are hosted on. There are bound to be thousands more of these free CC Muse sites with poor image optimization zapping the resources of our server architecture for paid partners.
I realize that the move to AWS will lessen this impact a bit but I still find it worrysome.
Also, are paid Partner accounts and their clients hosted on the same servers as the free or "included" sites for Muse and CC members? I don't think we should be on the same servers as the free sites either.
Just a suggestion but I cannot find a suggestions/feature request forum to post this on and I want to see what others think about this topic.
