-
1. Re: Matterhorn Protocol PDF fails PAC2 PDF/UA checker!
CtDave Aug 25, 2013 7:32 AM (in response to a C student)"PAC" - any version - ain't the holy grail. It is ,imo, a rather didactically dogmatic developer centric tool. With that said should it be in one's tool box? Yes. There's not much else out that there. Acrobat's Full Check, PAC, the nifty "to html" provided by Callas are all useful when working with PDF. However, each reflects the "developer's spin" to a greater or lesser extent. One must understand that and compensate accordingly.
Be well...
-
2. Re: Matterhorn Protocol PDF fails PAC2 PDF/UA checker!
a C student Aug 25, 2013 6:31 PM (in response to CtDave)Agreed and thanks for your response. Any ideas on how one would compensate in the case of this error: “Figure element on a single page with no bounding box”? While I understand the limitations of PAC and other tools, clients really prefer it when the checker shows "Pass" - it saves a lot of time and explanations.
-
3. Re: Matterhorn Protocol PDF fails PAC2 PDF/UA checker!
a C student Aug 29, 2013 7:23 AM (in response to a C student)I have found that if I open the figure in an image editing application (I used Irfanview), save it to a file, delete the original image from the pdf and replace it with the image from the file, the error goes away. If anyone finds an easier way please post.



