Why don't you put it all in one MSO?
Thanks for your reply, Bob! We can certainly do that.
It does seem like a workaround though. Is there a known issue with layering of MSOs? It seems that we're doing everything right and not getting the expected result.
Without seeing the files it's really hard to tell. I always advise using
one MSOs whenever possible.
Actually, Bob, I don't think it would be that easy to build it as one MSO. We would have to have:
- Inactive Share/Inactive Enlargement
- Inactive Share/Active Enlargement
- Active Share/Inactive Enlargement
- Active Share/Active Enlargement
and that would be pain to make .. especially for several pages per article. And then the same for the other orientation.
Here is a link to the file that exhibits this behaviour. Would you mind having a look? I hope it's something painfully simple that causes us this grief.
Sorry, Bob's suggested workaround doesn't work for us in this case—the MSO would have been too complex.
I thought that I should bump this and ask again if anyone is experiencing this same issue with MSOs not layering as expected?