0 Replies Latest reply on May 24, 2007 2:35 AM by jovox

    Are people using assemblers?

      I've been working with flex for a couple of weeks now. The application I'm writing is built on top of a EJB3 application.
      I have number of entity beans in my system and they all have relationships to each other. many-to-one, one-to-many, one-to one etc.
      class Group {
      public int getId(){...}
      public String getGroupName(){...}
      public List<Member> getMember(){...}
      class Member {
      public int getId(){...}
      public String getFirstname(){...}
      public String getLastname(){...}
      public String getUsername(){...}
      public Group getGroup(){...}

      In my EJB3 layer I have two session beans: GroupManager and MemberManager.
      The MemberManager looks like this:

      interface MemberManager {
      public Member getMember(int id);
      public Member getMemberByUsername(String username);
      public List<Member> getMembers();
      public Member save(Member member);
      public void delete(Member member);
      ....and a few more

      Ther GroupManager looks similair
      interface GroupManager {
      public List<Group> getGroups();
      public Group getGroup(id);
      public void delete(Group group)
      public Group save(Group group)

      As far as I know there are two ways to write a flex application for administrating my Groups and Members: RemoteObject and Assemblers.

      What I have read in the docs, assemblers is what I should use for this kind of situations.
      I would then write two assemblers: GroupAssembler and MemberAssembler.

      something like this:
      class GroupAssembler extends AbstractAssembler {
      GroupManager gm;
      public List<Group> fill(List params) {
      return aListOfGroups; (with or without it's containing members?)

      public Group getItem(Map idMap) {
      id = idMap.get("id");
      // ask the GroupManager for a group with the id read from the idMap
      return theGroup;

      publiv void delete(....)
      public Group createItem(....)

      and the MemberAssembler would look soemthing like this:

      class MemberAssembler {
      List<Member> fill(...) {
      return aListOfMembers

      Member getItem(Map idMap) {

      Now, what about my MemberManager.getMemberByUsername().
      In all examples I have seen and in all documentations I have read I havn't found one single example describing this issue.
      the AbstractAssembler's getItem(Map idMap) method is not designed to let me implement that fuctionality.
      Each assembler has ONE getItem() method and there is no way for me to determine is the client asks for member by id or members by username.

      Have I missed something fundamental here? Is there a way to have more than one getItem method or a way to implement the getItem in a way so that it knows that the flex client is asking "by username " or "by id"?

      Another aproach to this problem to use RemoteObject instead of assemblers but than I'd loose the other nice functionality
      that I'd have to implement myself. Like DataService.getItem(id, member) which instead of returning a new instance of Member updates all properties of my member object.

      I don't think my situation is unique and lots of other people working with assemblers (if there are any) should have seen the problem and hopefully solved it.

      So my questions are: Is there a solution for my problem above and are there any other people than me working with assemblers?