-
1. Re: Type 3 Font
Jacob Bugge May 11, 2014 2:47 PM (in response to mtnbiker7)mtnbiker,
There seems to be a discrepancy between the terms, .afm and .pfb relating to PostScript Type 1.
PostScript fonts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As I (mis)understand it, if you are after a Type 3 appearance based upon Garamond, which is quite far from it in itself, you may think in terms of changing the appearance, maybe applying effects as you may do in Illustrator.
-
2. Re: Type 3 Font
Dov Isaacs May 11, 2014 5:38 PM (in response to mtnbiker7)Are you sure you really mean Type 3 fonts as opposed to Type 1 fonts? Very few fonts have been offered in Type 3 format in nearly 25 years!
Although Type 3 fonts are most often associated with bitmap fonts, in reality, a Type 3 font may have its glyphs defined as any arbitrary PostScript program (including the ability to vary a glyph's appearance based on external factors, random numbers, etc.). Type 3 fonts don't provide for “hinting” – automatic adjustment by the renderer to account for the combination of low resolution and/or low magnification (i.e., small point sizes).
You should also be aware that much if not most application software and operating system software provides no support for Type 3 fonts.
Exactly why do you want Type 3 as opposed to Type 1? Is there some special effect you are trying to achieve?
– Dov
-
3. Re: Type 3 Font
mtnbiker7 May 12, 2014 7:19 PM (in response to Jacob Bugge)Sorry, I actually did mean Type 1, not Type 3. I've tried Fonts.com but no success.
-
4. Re: Type 3 Font
mtnbiker7 May 12, 2014 7:25 PM (in response to Dov Isaacs)Yes, sorry. I made a mistake and realized it should have been Type 1 not Type 3. Having realized that, I've found several sources where I can get a Type 1 Garamond font. Thank You!
-
5. Re: Type 3 Font
Dov Isaacs May 12, 2014 10:02 PM (in response to mtnbiker7)By the way, you really should consider OpenType fonts instead of Type 1 fonts. OpenType fonts are cross-platform compatible and depending upon the foundry and the particular font can potentially offer many more built-in typographical features in conjunction with not only high end layout programs like InDesign, but also word processing software such as recent versions of Microsoft Word.
Unless you have a particular reason for use of Type 1, OpenType (either the OpenType CFF or OpenType TrueType flavours) is a much better choice.
- Dov
-
6. Re: Type 3 Font
mtnbiker7 May 13, 2014 4:01 PM (in response to Dov Isaacs)Thanks, you are correct on that. I'm, however, using antiquated conversion software at work that specifically requires Type 1, hence my search for that particular type. But that said, I do appreciate your knowledge and input that you shared. Thank you!
-
7. Re: Type 3 Font
Thomas Phinney May 13, 2014 4:36 PM (in response to mtnbiker7)Note that if you have an ongoing need for Type 1 fonts, it might be useful to be able to convert existing fonts. You need to be careful about licensing issues, as many commercial fonts don't allow such conversions. (Adobe's do, as long as they are fonts entirely owned by Adobe or were licensed before 2011.)
But assuming you can clear that hurdle, a tool such as our own TransType 4 (US $97) might be handy.
-
8. Re: Type 3 Font
Les ONeill May 14, 2014 1:04 AM (in response to Thomas Phinney)"our own TransType 4"
Hey Thomas, I thought you worked for extensis or have you shifted to FontLab?
-
9. Re: Type 3 Font
Thomas Phinney May 14, 2014 9:53 AM (in response to Les ONeill)I joined FontLab just two weeks ago.
http://blog.fontlab.com/varia/thomas-phinney-joins-fontlab-2/
Huh, something funny happening with the ampersands on that page... will have to look into it.
-
10. Re: Type 3 Font
Thomas Phinney May 14, 2014 10:07 AM (in response to Thomas Phinney)Fixed ampersand issue.





