-
1. Re: Choppy Type
P Spier Aug 20, 2014 2:25 PM (in response to CoGordo)Probably the font, and maybe your display (Retina? CS6?). Screen grab looks fine here.
-
2. Re: Choppy Type
Doc Maik Aug 21, 2014 4:23 AM (in response to P Spier)For me too. I don't see anything choppy.
-
3. Re: Choppy Type
CoGordo Aug 21, 2014 11:35 AM (in response to P Spier)Peter, I have a 27inch Imac 2009 model and I am using adobe cc. I haven't gone to print yet but I wanted to make extra sure it was my display and not the file.
-
4. Re: Choppy Type
Ellis home Aug 21, 2014 11:51 AM (in response to CoGordo)Well, it looks choppy to me. Can you share a sample of the pdf or the .indd to take a look at it. You can use dropbox.com or similar.
-
5. Re: Choppy Type
Doc Maik Aug 22, 2014 1:07 AM (in response to Ellis home)The thread starter should perhaps explain what he/she exactly means by "choppy" regarding the type. In the screenshots, both fonts are rendered without clear type or anti-alias, as it seems. This is a matter of font display on PC screens and the OS settings. When printing in resolutions of >300dpi, which you could test on every simple inkjet printer, you should not see any unaliased borders as long as the font is embedded and not replaced anyhow by the PDF viewer. Alternative, the CCA banner could be rasterised to 300dpi or higher and treated with filters in Photoshop, then placed in Indesign.






