IE only throws a hissy fit about it when you test locally. The moment you place content on a server, all it well and it doesn't act like the world is ending because you are now in a different "security zone".
I suppose I should clarify the "server" mention; If you run it from a network server, you will still see issues as it is still considered a local drive. What I meant was a web server where things are served via HyperText Transfer Protocol.
Thank you very much for your comments related to ActiveX controls and security.
But do you know if the Responsive HTML output displays the TOC and topic content coupled in the same view? That is what I am hoping to accomplish.
The skin I selected for the Responsive HTML output (Theme1 Standard) shows the TOC in the left column and the topic content to the right. However after I generated my project I was only able to view either the TOC or the topic content. And then after I click a topic in the TOC, the TOC closes and a separate view of the topic opens. The TOC and topic content are not visible at the same time.
I believe if I could resolve this, I may be happy.
Here's a quick question I am hoping you are able to answer.
If our management does not want us to use ActiveX controls or Flash, and we distribute our user guide and context sensitive application help via a web server, (distributed state-wide) what type of output would you recommend we use to develop FrameMaker/RoboHelp project output?
I have been testing most of the output options in the Single Source Layout pod. So far I am still not sure which one we should be using.
Are you having the content reside on the web server to be accessed each time someone looks something up in the help or are you just placing it there so that it can be downloaded? What are you using right now?
Thank you very much for asking for clarification Jeff. To answer your question, here's a description of our current system.
Our NYS county users, access our state-developed application through an Internet portal (I believe it is Centerport) (Welcome to My NY.gov Online Services)
User who have questions about using the application click the Help menu to access a pdf file (which currently is distributed via a web server). Pdf bookmarks (based on FrameMaker Cross Ref markers) are used to enable the user to open a specific page of the 1,000 pdf file that relates to the application page of their question.
The current problem with this is that the pdf file take several minutes to open, and each time the user wants to access a different help page, the entire pdf file needs to download again, making the system somewhat unusable. And counties that lack the necessary bandwidth to open the 1,000 page pdf are unable to access anything--so there is no help for those counties.
We were hoping to use of FM/RH so that the help system opens much quicker and enables all counties to access the help system. And I also hope to provide popup explanations of the dialog box controls as we currently have approximately 400 hundred pages of bulleted items that explain the controls in each of the dialog boxes. This is "unusable" because there are so many bulleted items, by the time you find the bulleted description associated with a dialog box control, you forgot where you saw the picture of the dialog box. I wanted to enable users to simply click a dialog box control to see a description at the same time they are viewing the graphic of the dialog box.
To resolve both of these usability issues I developed two demos (WebHelp and FlashHelp) both of which open quickly and have popup explanations of dialog box controls. All team staff who view these demos think it is great! Who wants to be lost in hundreds of pages of bullets without getting an easy answer to your question?
However, our IT staff (who didn't even look at the demo) says we can't use our project because it is based on ActiveX controls or Flash, both of which are not secure.
I don't want to give up, I am simply trying to find a solution that satisfies our IT staff. In short we need output that isn't based on ActiveX, Flash, opens quickly, and hopefully permits popup information.
Thank you, I am looking forward to your reply! Is there a possible solution?
What are the pages currently coded in? They must employ some sort of scripting to be able to function.
Currently, our source FrameMaker files (with Cros Ref bookmarks to indicate help topics) are saved as a single pdf and our make-shift help system calls reference to the help-on-page bookmark (via Java) to display the appropriate pdf page.
Does this answer your question? Thank you very much for asking.
Sort of – I was really referring to the web page that is actually doing something – not the help that was called. Presumably, it must use some scripting to accomplish whatever task is asked of it. I think your best results might come from getting your IT guys to suggest what format the text and/or html you produce can be displayed and accessed to their satisfaction. Then, that might impact what tool(s) you use to produce it. What do other government agencies use for their help systems?
Thank you very much for the response. Your response sounds like "common sense." I believe the trouble we are having is that our IT staff knows what they don't want but sense they are unfamiliar with RoboHelp, they don't know what they want. So if I ask them to suggest something, they may not have anything much to say.
As far as what web page displays, in the current system the pdf help that displays is not based in html code. The browser window is only used to display the pdf page without html.
I am trying to convert the display to html. And I am trying to figure out if any of the RoboHelp HTML output options can generate a project without use of ActiveX. At the moment, I still don't know which outputs don't use ActiveX. I was guesing the Responsive HTML5 does not use ActiveX. Is that a correct assumption? If so, I was going to try to generate a project that is based on Responsive HTML5 output. Otherwise, I don't know what to do.
Betsy, I thought I explained the AcitveX issue earlier in the thread. Maybe you missed it? Or maybe you didn't fully understand what was said. In that case, I'll offer the following.
When Microsoft Internet Explorer tries to present the content, it normally issues a warning about "ActiveX controls". The thing is, it's sort of a "false positive". Sort of like smelling smoke and screaming FIRE without knowing there is an actual fire.
Thank you!! You are right, I didn't fully understand your first explanation. And I understand as you restated your explanation. THANK YOU!!
Now to finish up my project! You made my day.