If one has a standard license, would painting a stock photo, and then selling it, being violation of 4.2.(B)(1) or (2), which deal with the product being distinct and not being valued based on the image itself? I read the terms already, but just want some clarification of the scenario. If it is in violation, would having an extended license make it okay?
An extended license helps you to commercialize the use of the image but making changes to an actual image could cause a concern to the artist who submitted that image.