probably meant jpg sequence. zhpg sequence sounds like a futuristic sequence. maybe we should have this
Tell me, please, why render scenes in avi file
no reason. if you need to render a lossless file that are enough decent options to go around. all involving QT as a container. Animation would probably give you the fastest render results. it all depends of course where is this file going from here.
more about rendering and exporting in Ae can be found here:
I will edit your question. Too many mistakes, I'm sorry.
I visualized a scene in the jpeg-sequence. Then he decided to see how long it will take to process the same scene without using effects. To do this, the resulting sequence I put in a new stage and started to render. The result was about 10 minutes. But to render a scene effktami takes about 3 minutes. Why time effects without leaving less?
I see you are struggling to make your self clear. this post is actually more vague than the first! why don't you write in your own native language and we can let the translate function here in the forum to help us?
it appears you are asking why does it take more time to render composition without effects applied than with effects applied? we need more information and more clarity. try reading this: FAQ: What information should I provide when asking a question on this forum?