-
1. Re: How to remove these types of shoes and leave only the feet of this image?
davescm Dec 29, 2016 5:13 AM (in response to lorenzov38569809)This is virtually the same question that you asked - and was answered in your earlier thread
How do I redraw feet of my image of a character with shoes?
and you asked 4 months ago in this thread
how to remove shoes of any image of a person or a character in Adobe Photoshop?
As was answered in those threads , you can mask out the feet using a layer mask and draw in any image of feet you want on a new layer.
Dave
-
2. Re: How to remove these types of shoes and leave only the feet of this image?
lorenzov38569809 Dec 29, 2016 10:28 AM (in response to davescm)Does the historic brush tool do this? How to use the historic brush tool for this image?
-
3. Re: How to remove these types of shoes and leave only the feet of this image?
Peru Bob Dec 29, 2016 11:02 AM (in response to lorenzov38569809)See here:
-
4. Re: How to remove these types of shoes and leave only the feet of this image?
Trevor.Dennis Dec 29, 2016 1:28 PM (in response to lorenzov38569809)lorenzov38569809 wrote:
Does the historic brush tool do this? How to use the historic brush tool for this image?
This has to be a troll. No one could possibly believe that you could remove the outer pixels of an image and reveal what lies beneath.
-
5. Re: How to remove these types of shoes and leave only the feet of this image?
lorenzov38569809 Dec 31, 2016 10:01 AM (in response to Trevor.Dennis)I do not know what you said
-
6. Re: How to remove these types of shoes and leave only the feet of this image?
Semaphoric Dec 31, 2016 3:53 PM (in response to Trevor.Dennis)Widow: "Can you take this photo of my late husband, and remove his hat?"
Retoucher: "Sure thing, Ma'am. So, what side did he part his hair on?"
Widow "Won't you find out when you take his hat off?"
-
7. Re: How to remove these types of shoes and leave only the feet of this image?
c.pfaffenbichler Jan 2, 2017 6:14 AM (in response to lorenzov38569809)I do not know what you said
Not quite sure about your problem:
Do you believe that a 2-dimensional image is a 3-dimensional representation of its subject including its inner workings?
Or do you actually have a 3d-model? (Even in this case it is not a given that the »feet« inside the »shoes« would have been modelled.)