• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

RAID setup for PP/AE?

New Here ,
Jan 28, 2017 Jan 28, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hey all!

Quick question: I recently picked up an 8-bay Areca 8050T2. I also grabbed 8x 8TB Seagate IronWolf drives.

I'm wondering what the best RAID setup for PP/AE? I'm using a Mac Pro with a 1TB drive as well.

Should I do RAID 5? RAID 0 with constant backups? Something else? How should I set up PP/AE?

Second question, if you don't mind: can I put my raw files on the RAID and ALSO render to the same RAID, or will that cause performance issues?

Thank you all so much.

Views

338

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Jan 28, 2017 Jan 28, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

RAID 3, or 30 and RAID 6 or 60 are great for sequential files like video.  Never use RAID 0 because it has no redundancy and do not use RAID 5 as it is slow on sequential files, really for high usage short files.

You might want to read what my dear departed forum friend Harm used in the past before extreme speed SSD's were available

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jan 28, 2017 Jan 28, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Question, if you don't mind:

Isn't RAID 5 a "less parity-ed" version of RAID 6? Would it not be faster because you are writing 1/2 parity blocks than RAID 6?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Jan 28, 2017 Jan 28, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

RAID 5 is never recommended for video editing

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jan 28, 2017 Jan 28, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Why is that?

(Not being argumentative, sincerely want to learn)

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Jan 28, 2017 Jan 28, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Did you read Harm's article?

I just checked it out and see that Harm did not use RAID 6/60 so I should not have mentioned it.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Valorous Hero ,
Jan 28, 2017 Jan 28, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

many of the folks here are convinced raid 3 is the only option as its slightly faster for editing, but you can pick whichever raid fits your needs best. if you just want max performance with no data/drive protection you could do raid-0, but raid 5 wouldn't be a good option for data/drive protection with that many drives. instead, raid 6 is a good option as it should be able to loose two drives and recover. the extra parity in raid 6 should be more robust with any bit rot (file corruption). raid 30/50 can loose two drives, but not two in the same raid 3/5 subset and the parity isn't shared across all 8 drives. raid 10 is even more robust, but would loose half the total capacity.

if the data that will be placed on the 8-bay Areca 8050T2 is important or critical, it should be backed up to another copy/location as well. a nas, single external drives, the internet/cloud etc. when buying lots of drives at the same time, they are mfg'd at the same time and multiple can fail at the same time. so its not unheard of to have a raid built to handle 1-2 drive failures go completely down when 2-3+ fail at the same time, or more fail when the raid is trying to rebuild/recover from the first lost drive(s).

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Guest
Jan 30, 2017 Jan 30, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

I think RAID 0 is probably not the best answer to speeding boot and loading times in 2011.

Solid State Drives [ SSD's] use memory chips rather than moving disks .

The OCZ vertex 3 series drives , or OCZ revodrive 2 will run many times faster than a RAID array .

Capacity is limited [ by cost] so most people use them as boot drives and storage for current projects , and add a back up hard drive or two for data storage .

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines