Hi Larry, I've asked a staff member to take a look here, but I am curious: the Adobe Stock subscription plans give you X number of standard assets at a specific monthly price, and standard assets beyond the monthly limit are $9.99 each, or $2.99, or $1.99 depending on the plan. I've not seen anything on Adobe Stock for $0.99.
What stock plan are you on?
[Edit... I just noticed the 750 assets per month plan for $199/month with additional assets at $0.99... is this the plan you have?)
a $499.99 photo
just out of interest... could you link this photo please?
I'm on this plan:
Adobe Stock - 10 images a month for DPC members (one-year)
Basically it's $10.00 a month and then $.99 per photo after that. It seems that the photo I inadvertently clicked on was a "premium" photo.
I was clicking on the shopping cart icons at the bottom of each photo so fast I didn't see any indication that one of the photos was "premium".
If you know someone at Adobe that can look into this it would be incredibly appreciated. Adobe can look at my buying pattern of hundreds of $.99 photos over the last two years and then all of a sudden a $499.99 charge.
I explained to the customer service person that I've been using Adobe products since 1994 and a Creative Cloud subscriber since the CC started. That didn't make any difference. I was told there was a no refund policy on stock and that was that.
It's photo #113213564, 'Full frame shot of gas masks by Cavan Images' on the Adobe Stock site. I was going to use it as a background for a DVD cover of a horror movie in which the killer wears a prominent gas mask.
Is it normal for 'Premium' stock images to carry a $500 price tag? What typically constitutes a Premium image? I can't help but feel they have made a mistake with this particular image, because I am not see any reason for it to be rated so highly.
I bet not even a Peter Lik image would be worth that sort money for stock use.
I just don't know what the normal price for a Premium photo is as I've never bought one. I assume that the price is negotiated between the photographer and Adobe. That's their problem.
As for whether I think the the photo is worth it... as you know, art is in the eye of the beholder...and also what the market will bear. All I know is that I could never afford it.
My issue is not really with the exorbitant price. My argument is with Adobe's practice of planting outrageously priced photos in the midst of their bargain priced inventory. And then not refunding payment when a hasty or caffeinated -shaky mouse click (on their deceptively placed product) happens in the heat of a deadline. It's almost like they're baiting people... putting a high priced item on the shelf at a 99 cent store and hoping the customer won't see the excessive charge on their bank statement.
It reeks of deception!
Even the fraud dept. at my bank contacts me when an unusual or out-of-character activity shows up on my credit card and they give me the benefit of explanation. Adobe has my spending pattern on record but they stuck to the 'no refund' policy like it was life-or-death. No consideration for customer loyalty, customer spending and buying habits, the fact that most of us designers live 'pretty close to the vest' (paycheck to paycheck, client-to-client, fixed incomes, etc.), or the instance of overwhelmed, over-tired saps like me that fall prey to their bait-and switch tactics.
I mentioned above that I've asked Adobe staff to have a look at this... but it was after hours yesterday. Let's see what kind of response comes today.
Thanks for providing the details, that will help.
I wish there was.
If you need it, the reference # for my conversation with Adobe support last night is, H0221846963.
Those are certainly nice images Jane. It might be that Adobe are selling exclusively with the high price. You can be fairly certain that such an image is unlikely to show up all over the place diluting your brand imagery.
Jane's link gives you the ideal person to contact in 'Head of Content' Scott Braut, if you can find contact details for him. Larry certainly has a valid point regarding the lack of fair warning.
1 person found this helpful
I'm surprised this is the first time we are running into this on the forum. (At least in my experience.) The only warning is the rather small, light gray "PREMIUM" under the download options. Like Jane, I had to google Premium to even learn of its existence. My only tip (for future readers of this thread, because I understand why you have cancelled your subscription, Larry) is to activate the filter option and set the price limit. That image isn't shown at $ or $$.
And for those of us new to the Premium option, in addition to Jane's link above, this might be helpful.
2 people found this helpful
I will arrange for customer support to contact you regarding the Premium image purchased in error.
Wish I would have known that filter trick before last night. i guess i never actually thought I'd need a price filter since i thought all the photos were $.99. Way too naive.
Thanks so much for the info. It means a lot.
Thank you so much, Bev. That would be incredible!!!
Hi Bev and Barb,
I have not heard from Adobe Customer Support since I called them to report this incident on Tuesday evening Mar 25.
Thanks for reaching out to me. I have not heard from Adobe Customer Support since I called them on Wednesday night, Mar 25, to report this incident. Best,Larry
[Personal information removed by moderator]