• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

AE Media Cache location, which is better??

New Here ,
Jun 28, 2017 Jun 28, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Dear all

I have a computer that has it's boot disk (C:) as an SSD. I have read that it is best to point your disc cache to an SSD drive, but I was wondering would it be better to have this pointing to another hard drive (7200rpm) and not the SSD as this is the boot disk?

Thanks in advance

Steve

Views

497

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

LEGEND , Jun 28, 2017 Jun 28, 2017

Ask yourself: Is it going to be easier to try and sort bunch of marbles into an icecube mold with too small holes or just dumping them into a fast spinning pot? That is exactly the issue here - SSDs work fabulously for small files that need to be stored and accessed rapidly, for linear access of large files not so much. Hence the myth of SSDs being per se superior holds no truth, even if Adobe keep propagating it themselves. For all intents and purposes, there would be barely any difference most

...

Votes

Translate

Translate
LEGEND ,
Jun 28, 2017 Jun 28, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Ask yourself: Is it going to be easier to try and sort bunch of marbles into an icecube mold with too small holes or just dumping them into a fast spinning pot? That is exactly the issue here - SSDs work fabulously for small files that need to be stored and accessed rapidly, for linear access of large files not so much. Hence the myth of SSDs being per se superior holds no truth, even if Adobe keep propagating it themselves. For all intents and purposes, there would be barely any difference most of the time. What your SSD could make up in theory by its faster transfer rates will be thwarted by extra wait and lookup cycles as its trying to spread your large files across its empty storage cells. Conversely, a platter drive may even be faster as long as its relatively empty because then the data can be dumped anywhere. See the logic? SSDs really only make sense if you have more than one of them and evewn then there still would be a difference between the more expensive ones for dedicated storage and your average system boot drive. So for what it's worth: Use your platter drive for the caches. Your SSD is probably too small, anyway, since those caches fill up quickly and then nothing works anymore.

Mylenium

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jun 28, 2017 Jun 28, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Thank you so much for your response. I will keep the files on the Sata drive. See ya!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines