This content has been marked as final. Show 7 replies
The CPD, HHP, LDB, and PSS files are supposedly machine-specific files, and should not be added into any source control product.
Hello ladwriter -
The CPD file is a Microsoft Access 97 database file that tracks darn near EVERYTHING in your project. This is why it is so important to "do things" (like add/delete files, folders, etc.) in RoboHelp. Here is a list of the tables in my RH7 project CPD file (you can figure out what they track from the names):
Missing Topic List
Welcome to the forum. (Don't you guys have any manners?)
Are you saying that you are applying source control to the RH project folders, and that you and another user can check out the same files before the other checks them back in?
If so, then I don't understand the purpose of source control, which I haven't used for RH.
Since the cpd file tracks activity and statuses in the project folder during each editing session and finally upon the project closing, separate versions certainly will become out of sync.
Does MS Access have a utility that compares two versions of the "same" file and lets you sync them reliably?
Hello ladwriter and Harvey -
(Sorry about that, my bad.)
WELCOME ladwriter to our little corner of the world!
Has your question been answered to your satisfaction?
Hi Harvey, and thank you for the welcome!
We have added our RoboHelp project to Microsoft Visual Studio Team Server for a couple of reasons. The first is to make sure we don't lose our work if one of our computers crashes. The other reason is that we are storing our project in the directory with the code for the software, so that we (our architects) can integrate it into the software build process. That part is beyond me.
So, to answer your question, we can both check the files out without locking them, and then we can each work on our own sections without any problems. The .cpd file does not give us the same merge choices as other "conflicts" do. For example, if my coworker creates a new topic and then checks her code in before I check mine in, when I try to check mine in it says there's a conflict - that such and such a file exists on the server. Then it gives me the option of merging it in with my version of the project since I didn't have it before. With the .cpd file, I don't get the option to merge her changes in with mine. My two options are to discard the server changes (hers) or undo my local changes. Either way it seems like we're losing something.
I think what Leon said about that file not being added to source control seems correct. However, if all the rest of the project is in source control, and that one is not, and my coworker and I have 2 different versions on our machines, what happens when we go to compile our help? Wouldn't that file need to be in the same location as the rest of the project files?
Unless we can figure this out, we have decided to take a copy of the project and put it out on another computer that gets backed up regularly. We can work on it there without source control, and then replace the source control project with the newer version on a regularly scheduled basis. Hopefully that will work.
I appreciate all the feedback!
Give some thought tot this:
... We are storing our project in the directory with the code for the software, so that we (our architects) can integrate it into the software build process.
The project files are not used for building the application's help system. WebHelp output is what they use, and it makes sense to apply version control there.
There lots of ways to back up project files so you don't lose your work.
A very effective way of synching your efforts is for one of you always to work on the "master" set and to import the other author's updated topics from a separate copy of the project. RH will automatically import any related graphics or images as the first author controls which revised topics will overwrite the earlier versions.
The second author would then trash the secondary copy so the master cpd file and other project housekeeping files remain the masters. Next time the second author can make a new copy of the master project.
If you had 5 or 6 authors working on the same project at the same time, things could get complicated.
Hi Ladwriter and Harvey,
Regarding storage of RH files etc, what we do here is to think of a help system in two parts, "Master" and "Build". The "Master" being the RH project file and the "Build" being the compiled output.
We store a copy of the "Master" and a copy of the "Build" on a secure network drive (which is backed up ) for each release of software. We also supply a separate copy of the build to the developers to add to their area.
The current work is done on local hard drives with appropriate backup. We don't use any kind of source control software.