This content has been marked as final. Show 6 replies
To update, this is using Windows XP Pro OS.
A DNG file created by any version of the DNG converter is supposed to be able to be opened by any version of ACR from version 2.4 onward. ACR 2.4 is the only one that is compatible with Photoshop CS. Are you certain that you have 2.4 installed, and installed correctly? In Photoshop, go to Help/About Plug-Ins and click on Camera Raw. What information is provided there?
To get a DNG file from a Fuji S5 camera to be readable in Camera Raw 2.4 running under Photoshop CS, you need to use the "Convert to linear image" preference in the DNG converter. This is because Camera Raw 2.4 does not have support the SR blending algorithm required by Fuji S5. The "Convert to linear image" causing the DNG converter to do the blending and store the blended image in the DNG file.
Thank you Jim and Thomas,
I do have ACR 2.4 and have successfully opened Raw files (including a new Olympus dSLR file).
It sounds like my answer is in the preferences box of DNG Converter.
Using that info I successfully opened the file.
Once again, thank you.
But doesn't "convert to linear image" effectively mean the resulting DNG file isn't raw anymore? If I understand correctly, to linearize a raw file the converter has to perform the demosaicing (at some arbitrary default parameter settings) and then save the result as an 16-bit RGB TIFF file in DNG disguise. Or did I get it wrong?
It depends on how you define a raw format. As far as the Camera Raw adjustment controls are concerned, you cannot tell the difference between a linear dng and "raw data" dng, since all the current Camera Raw adjustment controls happen after demosaic step.
(Both Canon and Kodak have cameras that produce demosaiced "raw" file formats in some cases. In Canon's case, the new "sRAW" format is already demosaiced. Some Kodak cameras (e.g. Kodak 14n, etc.) also saved a "lower resolution" raw format that was also demosaiced.)
The dividing line between a "raw" format and a "rendered" format is with whether the data stored in the file is scene referred or output referred. As long as the data is in a scene referred color space, it is easy to change the white balance, exposure, tone curve, etc. Once the data is converted to an output referred color space, it gets much harder to change those parameters without causing artifacts.
That said, it is better to keep the image in mosaic format if possible, since this allows you to take advantage of better demosaic algorithms in the future. For this user, that is not possible because Camera Raw 2.4 does not have a demosaic algorithms that works for the Fuji S5, so using the linear form of dng solves that problem.