This content has been marked as final.
Show 2 replies
-
1. Re: Auto-stack by name
hillrg Mar 2, 2007 12:06 PM (in response to SimonTindemans)As I have suggested before, I think stacking on the original date/time. It is unlikely that two different images willl have an identical cature time to the 1/100 second. -
2. Re: Auto-stack by name
SimonTindemans Mar 5, 2007 4:38 AM (in response to SimonTindemans)Yes, that sounds like a good idea. This could be easily implemented by dragging the 'stack by time' slider all the way to the left. Currently, this simply splits all stacks, like the 'unstack' command.
The only (minor) disadvantage of this method would be images that have no, or inconsistent, time information, such as composites or JPGs with stripped headers. Despite this, stacking by identical date/time would certainly be a good start.

