Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi folks! Hopefully by my asking this and having others review it, it will help others in their upgrade efforts!
I'm the only "real" technical writer at my company (full-time/titled) and need some support from the community on my grand(iose?) plans. We're upgrading our KB's from RH7 to RH8 to allow more "authors" to come on board to support me - their basic responsibility is content editing and updating.
I'd like some input on this plan and see if I'm missing anything BIG or if there's a "gotcha" I didn't mention. I didn't see anything else on this particular type of upgrade... I think mainly because I dove into the multi-author environment head first and never looked back.
Current Environment: Running a front-line support KB in RH7, 4 authors and myself, RSC 3.1 running source control on a database server as project "X".
Project size and characteristics: 2300 topics; 480 variable, 120 snippets. Four SSL's for different audiences. Output is WebHelp on DFS based servers (replicated to remote sites for business continuity - think "mirror" if on web);
Usage: 60-100 users daily;
Generation/Publishing: daily when updates occur.
End State: RH8, 6 authors, RSC 3.1 running source control on database server as project "Y" (this is to allow us to parallel the RH7 and RH8 releases and retire the bloated RH7 database (two years of changes).
Procedure: (I will perform these steps unless otherwise noted).
One additional note. There is a strong push to add about 3,000 new items to the KB. I say items because I have not evaluated content and do not know if "items" corresponds to topics. Could be a 1:1; likely a 1:3 (i.e., 9,000 new items). These items would probably be limited to only one SSL (group). Should I put these additional items in a separate project (start afresh) for performance sake?
Thanks in advance.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Disregard. Plan implemented successfully. For the most part as-is.