I am trying to make the case that using Flex 4 with RSLs is more sensible than developing pure AS3 applications with no Flex or Spark at all. In the former case, file sizes are comparable to the latter, save for about 2 MB worth of RSLs. However, it seems logical that the vast majority of users will already have these assets cached.
So I have three questions:
I have heard that Adobe hasn't released any official statistics, but I'm wondering if anyone has done their own testing with server logging.
I don't know of any statistics. It might also depend on the demographics of
There is no way to determine for sure where the SWZ came from, but you could
probably guess by looking at getTimer() somewhere in your code.
Ignoring bandwidth and download, the SWZ has very little overhead, but it is