Is there a way to inhibit the "copied in" 02.chm chm being output from project 10, or re-import 02.chm (the new one) when project 10 compiles.
You can compile each project separately then copy that project's CHM to some target folder. Specifying all projects to build to a single folder will cause RoboHelp to output whatever baggage files it has in the last project built (without knowing the nitty-gritty of your setup). Explicitly copying specific files after they are compiled takes the job out of RoboHelp's hands.
Essentially (guessing at your SSL):
rhcl.exe S:\STHELP\SOURCE\en-US\RoboHelp\01Help\01Help.xpj -b
rhcl.exe S:\STHELP\SOURCE\en-US\RoboHelp\02Help\02Help.xpj -b
rhcl.exe S:\STHELP\SOURCE\en-US\RoboHelp\10Help\10Help.xpj -b
xcopy S:\STHELP\SOURCE\en-US\RoboHelp\01Help\!SSL!\Microsoft_HTML_Help\01.chm //sometargetmachine/targetfoldername /d /y
xcopy S:\STHELP\SOURCE\en-US\RoboHelp\02Help\!SSL!\Microsoft_HTML_Help\02.chm //sometargetmachine/targetfoldername /d /y
xcopy S:\STHELP\SOURCE\en-US\RoboHelp\10Help\!SSL!\Microsoft_HTML_Help\10.chm //sometargetmachine/targetfoldername /d /y
If you are just linking to external topics among your CHMs, then they don't even really need to be in the project when it is compiled. If the CHMs are merged then you could likely just alternate the compile and copy commands.
Hope this helpful somewhat.
What I have are numerous projects that contain merged help which reference each other like a nest of ants on bungee ropes!
I did consider creating each chm in its own folder first and then copying each created chm into a single folder however, but would have meant re-creating over 200 ssl files and discarding the work already done. I was looking for another solution and I think I may have it.
Given that all project source files are located in a single folder, by purging the folder of ALL chm before running the command lines batch file, there are no old baggage files to interfere with the process. This does leave each project with a host of broken links to those missing baggage files (I must admit that I do not like to see ANY broken links) but it does seem to work.
Can you see any other problem with this approach?