2 Replies Latest reply on Apr 27, 2012 9:18 AM by Dunc.F

    DNG vs RAW files

    Dunc.F Level 1

      I am in the process of re-building my Lightroom Library after attending a workshop on LR 4

       

      What advantage, if any, is there using a camera manufactures RAW files vs converting them to DNG?

       

      I understand that DNG files tend to be smaller than RAW files and they no not create or need XMP sidecar files.

       

      Those reasons seem to argue heavily for just using DNG files.

       

      I would appreciate your wisdom!

       

      Dunc

        • 1. Re: DNG vs RAW files
          Jeff Schewe Level 5

          Dunc.F wrote:

           

          I am in the process of re-building my Lightroom Library after attending a workshop on LR 4

           

          While I agree for long-term preservation and conseversation, DNG is a good solution, however if you are using Lightroom you need to consider what it is you actually want (vs. what you think you want) out of DNG.

           

          Yes, DNG is a good long-term solution, but short term, the odds are that current and new cameras will not lose support by ACR/LR in the foreseeable future. So, what will DNG give you in Lightroom? Well, a bigger backup actually. If you convert from raw to DNG, all settings are stored directly in the DNG file. What that means is if you "touch" that image by making any adjustments (or editing the metadata) the changes will be saved inside the xmp headers in the DNG file (assuming you actually save the xmp to the file). Conversly, if you use the original raw file, LR will treat those as read only files and save all the settings and metadata in a .xmp file which is a tiny text file. So, with DNG, a date modified will require a backup of the entire DNG file (multiple MBs) but if you use raws with sidecars, they are tiny text files (think 500 KBs).

           

          DNG is a really good idea, but it may not be an optimal situation for LR at this time depending on how you work. Yes, if you needs to send raw files to other people, use DNG so you can lock the settings, snapshots and metadata in the DNG file. But if you are only working for yourself in LR, you need to ask yourself how you want to work. If you (as I do) tend to write (save) settings to raw files, your backups of DNG files will be much larger compared to the tiny .xmp text files...

          • 2. Re: DNG vs RAW files
            Dunc.F Level 1

            Thanks Jerff!
            That was a VERY helpful answer

            Dunc